It has been over a decade for KFNA of ice cream delivered to every party, meeting new neighbors, greeting so many old friends…it is hard to sit home on the first Tuesday in August and not think of all of you! Here are some photos to remind you of all the parties, from the past events!
Thank you for your patience and care as our city and nation experience a housing crisis compounded by the recent COVID-19 global pandemic. The population of unhoused neighbors living in MLK Park encampments has grown 3x since June.
How can I help my unhoused neighbors? The best way you can help right now is to use your time and energy to advocate for dignified short, medium and long-term housing solutions in our city. We do not recommend individual citizens attempt direct engagement work with encampments. Those experiencing homelessness deserve social service solutions delivered by trained and trauma-informed providers. Please respect the autonomy of all encampments, including prioritizing your personal safety and boundaries. Consider a financial donation to trusted organizations serving our community: ZACAH, Minnesota Indian Women’s Resource Center, The Link, and Park Avenue Center.
Housed neighbors stand in solidarity with unhoused neighbors prioritizing humanitarian aid, while acknowledging systems, events and health issues that can lead to short-term and chronic homelessness. Informal mutual aid efforts provide food and minimal ice to as many parks across the city as possible, this is not a sustainable solution. We demand our elected officials immediately address the current humanitarian housing crisis in Minneapolis. Please contact your elected officials, today! And then copy that email to Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Walz.
More information to be communicated through KFNA in the near future, stay tuned.
MLK Park Housing Advocates
Passed by the KFNA Board 7/19/2020
Whereas, the Kingfield Neighborhood Association (KFNA) sees an urgent need for transformational change to community safety and policing in the City of Minneapolis.
Whereas, the current Minneapolis City Charter does not allow for that change and accountability.
Whereas, the community of Minneapolis should be given the opportunity to voice their opinion on this change and directly engage with the question of policing and safety.
Whereas, the need and responsibility to take bold action now is essential.
KFNA calls on the City of Minneapolis Charter Commission to fulfill their duty and let the people of Minneapolis vote on a meaningful City Charter amendment.
But what does this mean and what will the Charter Language Be? That Remains to be Determined.
Background:
In June, the Minneapolis City Council unanimously initiated a process to allow voters to decide whether to adopt a proposed charter amendment whether to create a new Department of Community Safety & Violence Prevention. The Charter is essentially the City’s constitution, and this change (if approved by a majority of voters) would allow much more flexibility in how public safety is ensured or everyone in our City. The charter amendment would not eliminate law enforcement. Instead, this measure is needed so that we can incorporate strategies in addition to traditional policing. The language that was to be voted on as an ammednment is “Shall the Minneapolis City Charter be amended to provide for the establishment of a new Community Safety & Violence Prevention Department and to remove the Police Department.”
However in July the Minneapolis Charter Commission has proposed another possible change to the City Charter, our City’s constitution, and will also seek public input on this proposal. This new proposal removes minimum funding requirements for the Police Department without eliminating Police as a required department. The language for this ammednment is ““Shall the Minneapolis City Charter be amended to remove the minimum funding requirements of the Police Force.”
The Charter Commission’s new proposal is separate from the Minneapolis City Council’s existing proposal to eliminate Police as a required department in the City Charter and instead require the creation of a Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention, which may include a police division. PLEASE NOTE: If both proposals are approved by the deadline, they could both appear as ballot questions this November.
The public hearing for this newer proposed Charter amendment is set for:
How to participate and submit comments
Background information
As you may be aware, on July 20th, a special meeting of the Minneapolis Charter Commission, called for this purpose, accepted a proposed charter amendment offered by Commissioner Giraud-Isaacson which it intends to submit as a ballot question at the general election on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. The proposal that Commissioner Giraud-Isaacson put forward essentially strikes from the city charter the provision which establishes a minimum required MPD staffing level. It makes no other changes from the current charter.
The Charter Commission called a special meeting for next Monday, July 27, 2020, at 5 p.m. for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on this new proposed charter amendment.
The Charter Commission is empowered to submit proposed amendments to voters, as one of the primary pathways to securing a change in the city charter. If this new proposed amendment is adopted by the Charter Commission, the City Council and Mayor have the duty of setting the ballot language of the question that is referred to voters.
You can access all these details from the meeting agenda, including the new proposed charter amendment, shown as LIMS File No. CH2020-00020, at:
http://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Agenda/Charter/1788.
Last night, the Charter Commission accepted a new proposal to amend the city charter which, if adopted, would be submitted to voters as a separate ballot question at the general election in November 2020. It would not be a substitute for the proposal that was initiated by City Council. The Charter Commission serves as a kind of “standing constitutional convention” and is the body that holds the city charter in trust for the people of Minneapolis. Any proposal to amend the charter must involve the Charter Commission, and the Charter Commission itself may initiate amendments and refer those to the City’s voters in the form of ballot question.
Q. What is the status of the original proposal initiated by the City Council?
The Council’s proposed amendment remains in the custody of the Charter Commission. The Charter Commission has created a Public Safety Work Group to examine the Council’s proposal and to submit recommendations back to the full Commission for its consideration. Under state law, amendments that are initiated by the City Council (to be referred to voters as ballot questions) must first be submitted to the Charter Commission for its review and recommendation(s), if any. The statutes give the Charter Commission a total of not to exceed 150 days to complete its review and to make its report with recommendations, if any, to the City Council. Until the Charter Commission submits its report back to the City Council, it remains in the custody of the Charter Commission, and the City Council cannot take any further action on the proposal.
Q. What actions can the Charter Commission take with regard to the Council’s proposed amendment? What actions can the City Council take in response?
Under state law, the Charter Commission may only take one of three actions with respect to the City Council’s proposed charter amendment; these are:
(1) Accept the proposed amendment and return a report that recommends the question be submitted to the voters;
(2) Return a substitute proposal drafted by the Charter Commission and return a report that recommends that that substitute question be submitted to the voters; or
(3) Reject the proposed amendment and return a report that recommends the question not be submitted to the voters.
Once the Charter Commission reports its recommendation(s), if any, to the City Council, the matter is back in their jurisdiction, and the City Council may take any of the following actions:
(1) Submit the original proposed amendment it had initiated, with (or without) the Charter Commission’s approval, to the voters as a ballot question;
(2) Submit the substitute amendment provided by the Charter Commission (as is, with no further changes) to the voters as a ballot question; or
(3) Refuse to submit any question to the voters—and the proposal dies.
The point is that once the Charter Commission reports back to the City Council, then the City Council gets to decide (1) if a ballot question is submitted to voters and, if so, (2) what that question will be.
Q. What is the deadline for submitting the ballot question? What happens if the clock runs out?
The statutory deadline for submitting ballot questions is no later than 74 days before the date of the general election at which the ballot question is intended to be submitted to voters. This year, that statutory deadline is Friday, August 21. If the question is not submitted by that deadline, then it will not be referred to voters in November 2020.
The Charter Commission has up to a total of not to exceed 150 days to review the City Council’s proposed amendment. The Charter Commission received that proposed amendment at a special meeting called for that purpose on Wednesday, July 1, which means the full 150-day review period extends through November 27, 2020, which is well after the date of the general election on Tuesday, November 3, 2020.
If the deadlines are missed for the 2020 general election, the question could be reintroduced next year and referred to voters as part of the 2021 general election (Tuesday, November 2, 2021).
For both proposals, the Charter Commission needs to act by its regular meeting on Wednesday, August 5, in order to meet the statutory deadline for submitting ballot questions (Aug. 21). That would give the City Council one two-week cycle to complete all its work within that statutory timeline.
Additional FAQ’s about the public safety charter amendment.
Passed by the KFNA Board 7/19/2020
Votes: 11-2
Whereas, the Kingfield Neighborhood Association (KFNA) sees an urgent need for transformational change to community safety and policing in the City of Minneapolis.
Whereas, the current Minneapolis City Charter does not allow for that change and accountability.
Whereas, the community of Minneapolis should be given the opportunity to voice their opinion on this change and directly engage with the question of policing and safety.
Whereas, the need and responsibility to take bold action now is essential.
KFNA calls on the City of Minneapolis Charter Commission to fulfill their duty and let the people of Minneapolis vote on a meaningful City Charter amendment.
